Current and future options for anticoagulant therapy in the acute management of ACS
Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine, ISSN: 1092-8464, Vol: 15, Issue: 1, Page: 21-32
2013
- 8Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures8
- Readers8
Article Description
Opinion statement: Anticoagulation with a parenteral (intravenous or subcutaneous) antithrombin agent is foundational to the early management of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). While indications for, the timing of, and the choice among agents (other than aspirin) that provide antiplatelet effects are all subject to discussion, the need for acute anticoagulation is beyond question. There are a number of agents that can be used for anticoagulation in ACS, depending upon the intended near-term management of the patient (medical vs interventional), the patient's ischemic risk, and the patient's hemorrhagic risk. It is usually appropriate for therapy to be initiated in the emergency department (ED), which in turn supports close collaboration between "upstream" providers and interventional cardiologists. Clinical trial data suggest that "switching" agents during ACS care affords no efficacy advantage and may increase bleeding risk. At least 1 potential new agent (otamixaban) that can be used in all ACS care settings is on the near-term horizon, with the drug currently in late Phase III testing. © 2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84873082604&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11936-012-0216-3; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23086157; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11936-012-0216-3; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11936-012-0216-3; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11936-012-0216-3
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know