Intracranial Hemorrhage Risk in the Era of Antithrombotic Therapies for Ischemic Stroke
Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine, ISSN: 1534-3189, Vol: 18, Issue: 5, Page: 1-14
2016
- 14Citations
- 30Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations14
- Citation Indexes14
- 14
- CrossRef6
- Captures30
- Readers30
- 30
Review Description
Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is the most feared complication of antithrombotic medication use for the treatment and prevention of ischemic stroke. The risk of ICH while on blood thinners varies not only among different types of antithrombotics but also for the same agent used in different patient populations. Individual patients have different susceptibilities to ICH mostly due to the presence or absence of bleeding-prone cerebral pathologies such as cerebral amyloid angiopathy or hypertensive small vessel disease. The recent development and FDA approval of novel anticoagulants may lead to increased safety when compared to previously used medications, and the emergence of nonpharmacologic approaches may obviate the need for long-term anticoagulant strategies in certain clinical situations, such as left atrial appendage closure for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. As such, blanket recommendations for antithrombotic choice cannot be justified. Good practices in vascular neurology dictate combining all available data in order to choose the treatment that has the best risk-benefit ratio for each individual patient.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84959333497&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11936-016-0453-y; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26923382; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11936-016-0453-y; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11936-016-0453-y; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11936-016-0453-y
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know