Modelling and experimental validation of surface roughness in precision turning of dual-phase materials considering process uncertainties
International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing, ISSN: 1955-2505, Vol: 13, Issue: 1, Page: 59-74
2019
- 6Citations
- 9Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
This paper presents the development and experimental validation of a model to predict the surface roughness generated during precision turning. In particular, in addition to the kinematic parameters of the turning process, the proposed model also takes into consideration the effects of the minimum chip thickness and elastic recovery together with uncertainties attributable to the blend nature of dual-phase materials. The aim of the model is to minimise the contribution of uncertainty errors due to the stochastic distribution of the phases present within the material microstructure, to better predict surface roughness under different cutting conditions. The developed model was experimentally validated by machining two different dual-phase materials, brass 6040 and medium carbon steel AISI 1045, under a range of processing parameters. The roughness of the generated surface was measured and compared with those predicted by the model for similar conditions. Preliminary results indicated that the trend of model’s predictions agreed relatively well with the experimental results. However, the proposed model was then experimentally calibrated and lower differences between measured and predicted values were obtained, these varied between 16.5 and 23.3%. If results obtained at very low feed rates were excluded, the average differences for brass 6040 were substantially reduced from 20.5 and 16.5 to 11.2 and 10.3%, using cutting tools with nose radii of 200 and 400μm, respectively. Similarly, when machining medium carbon steel AISI 1045 using 200 and 400μm nose-radii cutting tools, the average differences decreased substantially, from 23.3 and 18.8 to 18.5 and 14.6%, respectively. Simulation-based study of the surface generation process in precision turning of dual-phase materials was conducted, and the results of the simulation trials have been utilised to optimise the cutting process.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85048038693&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12008-018-0490-8; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12008-018-0490-8; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12008-018-0490-8.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12008-018-0490-8/fulltext.html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12008-018-0490-8; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12008-018-0490-8
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know