Extracellular Vesicles as a Cell-free Therapy for Cardiac Repair: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Preclinical Trials in Animal Myocardial Infarction Models
Stem Cell Reviews and Reports, ISSN: 2629-3277, Vol: 18, Issue: 3, Page: 1143-1167
2022
- 18Citations
- 36Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations18
- Citation Indexes18
- 18
- Captures36
- Readers36
- 36
Article Description
Stem cell therapy for cardiac regeneration has been gaining traction as a possible intervention for the reduction of the burden associated with MI and heart failure. However, stem cell therapies have several shortcomings, including poor engraftment, limited improvements in cardiac function, and possible teratogenicity. Recently, extracellular vesicles (EVs) from stem cell sources have been explored as a novel therapy to regenerate the injured myocardium in several animal MI trials. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we investigate the use of stem cell-derived EVs for cardiac repair preclinical trials in animal MI models. Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science and grey literature (Canadian Agency for Drugs, Technologies in Health, and Google Scholar) were searched through August 20, 2020 and 37 articles were included in the final analysis. The overall effect size observed in EV-treated small animals after MI for ejection fraction (EF) was 10.85 [95 %CI: 8.79, 12.90] and for fractional shortening (FS) was 7.19 [95 %CI: 5.43, 8.96] compared to control-treated animals. The most abundant stem cell source used were mesenchymal stem cells which showed robust improvements in EF and FS (MD = 11.89 [95 % CI: 9.44, 14.34] and MD = 6.96 [95 % CI: 4.97, 8.96], respectively). Significant publication bias was detected for EF and FS outcomes. This study supports the use of EVs derived from stem cells as a novel therapy for cardiac repair after MI. Further investigation in larger animal studies may be necessary before clinical trials. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42019142218. Graphical Abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.]
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85124122315&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12015-021-10289-6; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35107768; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12015-021-10289-6; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12015-021-10289-6; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12015-021-10289-6
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know