Ethical Dilemmas Linked to Fragile X Testing of Minors—a Preliminary Survey Among Professionals
Journal of Molecular Neuroscience, ISSN: 1559-1166, Vol: 70, Issue: 2, Page: 254-259
2020
- 2Citations
- 26Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Asymptomatic female carriers of the FMR1 premutation at childbearing age have been mostly identified through prenatal genetic testing, which is routinely proposed in Israel. During the last few years, a premutation phenotype in males and females has been defined—FXAND, including neuropsychiatric disorder, learning difficulties, endocrine dysfunction, and premature ovarian failure. So when a family at risk is identified, should individuals be tested for premutation even if minors? In order to understand what professionals’ views are with regard to testing FMR1 premutation in minors, we performed a questionnaire testing both ethical attitudes and knowledge. Eighty-two percent of professionals would positively consider fragile X testing in minors, and an additional 15.4% would consider it in boys only. The specific phenotype of full mutation is recognized well by health professionals, while the premutation phenotype is not well known. There is a need to expand awareness on the fragile X premutation phenotype through better information. Testing of fragile X premutation status in minors should be considered, when at risk due to family history.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85078459917&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12031-019-01445-2; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31993931; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12031-019-01445-2; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12031-019-01445-2; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12031-019-01445-2
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know