Prognostic value of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in resected lung adenocarcinomas
Medical Oncology, ISSN: 1559-131X, Vol: 31, Issue: 1, Page: 771
2014
- 50Citations
- 16Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations50
- Citation Indexes50
- 50
- CrossRef27
- Captures16
- Readers16
- 16
Review Description
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and prognosis in patients with completely resected lung adenocarcinoma. A total of 131 patients were included in this study. EGFR mutation status in exons 18-21 of the tyrosine kinase-binding domain was detected using nested PCR amplification of individual exon. The χ test was used to analyze the associations between EGFR mutations and the different variables. The log-rank test and Cox regression model were used to evaluate the factors influencing disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). EGFR mutations in 18-21 exons were detected in 58 of the 131 patients (44.3 %). Smoking status (P = 0.029), N stage (P = 0.021), and pathologic stage (P = 0.048) were significantly associated with EGFR mutations. The median DFS in mutant EGFR and wild-type EGFR groups was 36.6 and 25.7 months, respectively (P = 0.533). No significant correlation was observed between EGFR mutations and OS (P = 0.564). However, patients with exon 19 mutation tended to have longer DFS than those with exon 21 mutation (46.2 vs. 21.9 months, P = 0.056), and the 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were significantly higher in patients with exon 19 mutation compared to patients with exon 21 mutation (100, 96.7, 93.3 vs. 91.3, 82.6, 60.9 %, respectively, P = 0.01). Our data demonstrated that EGFR mutations do not have significant prognostic value in primary resected lung adenocarcinomas, but patients with exon 19 mutation tended to have better prognostic value compared to patients with exon 21 mutation. © 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84887550108&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12032-013-0771-9; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24248816; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12032-013-0771-9; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12032-013-0771-9; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12032-013-0771-9; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs12032-013-0771-9; https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs12032-013-0771-9.pdf; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12032-013-0771-9; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12032-013-0771-9.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12032-013-0771-9?no-access=true
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know