The relationship between organizational improvisation and economic performance by moderating effects of regional economic level, market environment and cultural background: a meta-analysis
Operations Management Research, ISSN: 1936-9743, Vol: 15, Issue: 3-4, Page: 965-982
2022
- 2Citations
- 12Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In complex and turbulent environments, improvisation is critical for organizations to respond to unexpected contingencies, seize opportunities, and ultimately improve economic performance. However, existing studies have not yet reached a consensus on the relationship between organizational improvisation and economic performance. This study uses the meta-analysis to explore this relationship as well as the moderating factors that influence it. About 28 related studies and 32 effect sizes are obtained in a comprehensive literature search of 5371 sample data. Heterogeneity test demonstrates that the random-effect model is more suitable for this analysis. The results of publication bias and funnel plot test reveal that no publication bias exists in this meta-analysis. Main effect test discovers that organizational improvisation is positively related to economic performance (r = 0.177, p < 0.05). Moderating effects tests indicate that: (1) In regions with the low-level economy, organizational improvisation plays a more significant effect on economic performance (r = 0.303, p < 0.05); (2) In the turbulent market environment, organizational improvisation plays a more significant effect on economic performance (r = 0.248, p < 0.05); (3) In the eastern cultural background, organizational improvisation plays a more significant effect on economic performance (r = 0.303, p < 0.05). This study enriches the boundary conditions for the effectiveness of organizational improvisation to some extent and deepens the existing research results of organizational improvisation, which has important practical significance for the effective use of organizational improvisation by enterprises.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know