Bipaddled Pectoralis Major Myocutaneous Flap in Complex Oral Cancer Defects- A Single Center Experience with Quality of Life Assessment
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, ISSN: 0973-7707, Vol: 75, Issue: 2, Page: 641-648
2023
- 1Citations
- 9Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Introduction: Advanced stage malignancies of oral cavity commonly result in complex full thickness defects with subsequent functional and aesthetic loss. Through this article we describe our center’s experience in reconstruction of such defects with bipaddled pectoralis myocutaneous (PMMC) flap through an immediate, single-staged procedure. Materials And Methods: The study included a total of 54 patients who underwent composite resection and neck dissection followed by reconstruction of the defect with bipaddled PMMC flap. All patients were followed up post-operatively for 1 year and were monitored for flap and donor site related complications. Using University of Washington Quality of life v4 questionnaire (UW-QOL4), we assessed the QOL of 54 patients. The mean scores were compared to other similar studies. Results: The overall complication rate was 66.6%, whereas, 33.3% patients had no complications. The most common complication was wound dehiscence seen in 31.5% of cases in the recipient site and 12.9% in the donor site. Other complications were seroma, hematoma, plate exposure, orocutaneous fistula etc. Around 73.7% patients reported a good, very good or outstanding overall quality of life in the post-operative period. The mean composite QOL score was 65.84. Our study showed comparable domains of pain, appearance, activity, recreation, swallowing, chewing, speech, shoulder function and taste with other similar studies. Conclusion: Bipaddled PMMC flap proves to be a considerable alternative for microvascular free flaps in reconstruction of full-thickness defects of oral cavity owing to its reliable blood supply, accessibility, easier harvesting technique, cost effectiveness, high success rate and acceptable quality of life.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85144257468&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12070-022-03324-6; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37274991; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12070-022-03324-6; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12070-022-03324-6; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12070-022-03324-6
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know