PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

TACE plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors versus TACE plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

Hepatology International, ISSN: 1936-0541, Vol: 18, Issue: 2, Page: 595-609
2024
  • 9
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 3
    Captures
  • 2
    Mentions
  • 0
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

Most Recent News

Efficacy and Safety of Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Lenvatinib with or Without Tislelizumab as the First-Line Treatment for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Introduction Primary liver cancer is the sixth most common and fourth most lethal malignancy worldwide. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common form of primary

Article Description

Background: We conducted a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA) to compare the therapeutic efficacy and adverse events (AEs) between the following treatment strategies for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): TACE plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) (TACE + T + I) versus TACE plus TKIs (TACE + T). Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, the Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Embase for studies comparing TACE + T + I and TACE + T for the treatment of BCLC intermediate- or advanced-stage HCC. The objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and AEs were included as outcomes. We used a fixed- or random-effects model based on the results of a heterogeneity evaluation and performed a meta-analysis using Review Manager 5.3 and Stata 16.0. We then carried out the TSA. Results: Five studies examining a total of 425 patients were included in this study. Our meta-analysis revealed that, compared to TACE + T, TACE + T + I significantly improved the ORR (risk ratio [RR] = 1.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.27–1.85, p < 0.01) and extended both the median PFS (mean difference [MD] = 4.51 months, 95% CI = 2.16–6.87, p < 0.01) and median OS (MD = 5.75 months, 95% CI = 4.03–7.48, p < 0.01). These results were tested to be true by the TSA without requiring a larger information size. Among AEs, hypertension tended to occur more often in patients treated with TACE + T + I than in those treated with TACE + T (RR = 1.58, 95% CI = 1.05–2.40, p < 0.05). However, the TSA suggested that additional cases are necessary to confirm this difference. Regarding the other AEs, no significant differences were detected between the two groups. Conclusion: TACE + T + I showed better effects on the ORR, PFS, and OS than TACE + T as a treatment for BCLC stages B and C HCC, without an obvious increase in the AEs. Based on these findings, well-designed, large RCTs are suggested.

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know