RELOAD/CoAP architecture for the federation of wireless sensor networks
Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications, ISSN: 1936-6450, Vol: 13, Issue: 1, Page: 27-37
2020
- 2Citations
- 8Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Sensing devices are expected to interconnect over large geographical areas and federations of wireless sensor networks are expected in a near future. In such environments a critical issue is how to discover the resources available at devices in a scalable manner. For this purpose, a Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) Usage for REsource LOcation And Discovery (RELOAD), a generic self-organizing Peer-to-Peer (P2P) overlay network service, has been defined to be used as a lookup service, to store available device resources and as a cache for sensor data. Each P2P resource, at the RELOAD/CoAP overlay, includes references to device resources, hosted at one or more constrained nodes, but no provision is made for the insertion of bindings/references to P2P resources already available at the P2P overlay network. Such feature would increase the efficiency and consistency of storage, avoiding duplicate references, a very relevant issue for future IoT applications relying on the federation of wireless sensor networks. In this article an extension to the service provided by CoAP Usage is proposed so that resource bindings can be managed. Two binding models, and a heuristic algorithm for their implementation, are proposed. Results show that such models lead to a better resource organization, reducing the number of sensor resource entries and/or fetches to the P2P overlay.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85059757922&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12083-018-0712-7; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12083-018-0712-7; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12083-018-0712-7.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12083-018-0712-7/fulltext.html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12083-018-0712-7; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12083-018-0712-7
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know