A multicentre phase II study to evaluate sequential docetaxel followed by capecitabine treatment in anthracycline-pretreated HER-2-negative patients with metastatic breast cancer
Clinical and Translational Oncology, ISSN: 1699-048X, Vol: 10, Issue: 12, Page: 817-825
2008
- 2Citations
- 21Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Introduction: Treatment of HER-2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients after anthracycline exposure is controversial. Docetaxel/capecitabine is a promising regimen, but the administration schedule is not well established. Materials and methods: Treatment included 3 cycles of docetaxel 100 mg/m day 1 every 21 days followed by 3 cycles of capecitabine 1250 mg/m/12 h days 1-14. Patients not progressing were maintained with capecitabine 900 mg/m/12 h on days 1-14 every 21 days until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Results: Fifty-three anthracycline- pretreated patients were enrolled: median age 54 years, ECOG grade 0-1 86.7%. Most of the women received adjuvant chemotherapy (81%) and 5 patients (9%) had had prior metastatic chemotherapy treatment. Median time from anthracycline exposure was 29 months. ORR (intent-to-treatment analysis) after the sequential therapy was 51% (CI 95% 37-65) with 15% (CI 95% 7-28) of patients reaching complete responses. Median time to progression was 8.2 (CI 95% 7.1-10.7) months, with 61.9% (CI 95% 45.6-76.4) of the patients free of disease after 6 months. Median overall survival was not reached after a median follow-up of 10.4 months, and 75% of the patients were alive after 14.3 months. Survival rate after 12 months was 81.1% (CI 95% 68.0-90.6). The most frequent NCI grade 3-4 toxicities were hair loss (28.3%), asthenia (15.1%), stomatitis (11.32%) and nausea (11.32%). Severe hand-foot syndrome rate was 7.5%. Conclusions: Sequential docetaxel-capecitabine is feasible, effective and well tolerated in first-line MBC treatment. Evaluation of this schedule in randomised studies is warranted.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=60549098462&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12094-008-0295-5; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19068453; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12094-008-0295-5; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s12094-008-0295-5; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/s12094-008-0295-5; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12094-008-0295-5; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12094-008-0295-5
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know