Body dissatisfaction, rumination and attentional disengagement toward computer-generated bodies
Current Psychology, ISSN: 1936-4733, Vol: 42, Issue: 11, Page: 9146-9154
2023
- 1Citations
- 25Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Body dissatisfaction and rumination have been linked to attentional bias towards ideal and/or overweight body figures. However, methodological diversity in visual stimuli datasets usage has prevented straightforward comparisons between different studies on body dissatisfaction. Here, we applied a validated computer-generated body stimuli dataset to assess attentional disengagement in a non-clinical sample of 41 women. Self-reported body dissatisfaction and rumination were assessed either as correlational variables or as a function of attentional disengagement. Results indicated that attentional disengagement towards bodies explained 19% of the ruminative thinking variance, but only attentional disengagement towards overweight bodies positively correlated with rumination. An unexpected association between body dissatisfaction and attentional bias towards overweight bodies was observed. The more dissatisfied the subject was with their own body the faster their responses towards overweight body pictures (negative attentional disengagement). Results are discussed in relation to the limits of using computer-generated body pictures for emotional activation purposes. The negativity/positivity ratio for this type of image is also discussed considering attentional bias assessment.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know