Efficiency analysis of ITN loss function for deep semantic building segmentation
Earth Science Informatics, ISSN: 1865-0481, Vol: 17, Issue: 3, Page: 2011-2025
2024
- 2Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures2
- Readers2
Article Description
In using deep convolutional neural networks (DCNN) for semantic building segmentation, the standard loss functions such as cross-entropy usually create significant deviations in extracting buildings’ boundaries due to misalignment between the extracted edge map and the ground truth. Motivated to address this limitation, the current investigation presents a novel methodology for measuring boundary shifts by utilizing the concept of inverse transform network (ITN) to define the boundary loss function for capturing the spatial relationships between pixels in an image and the target boundaries. The proposed DCNN model is designed based on encoder-decoder architecture for semantic segmentation, which gradually increases the dimensionality of feature maps by embedding a specific module in the network decoder and making modifications. The proposed segmentation network's efficacy is evaluated by utilizing two distinct building datasets: the WHU aerial building dataset and the Massachusetts dataset. Our implementation results on both datasets demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed approach in generating meticulously structured segmentation outputs, boasting remarkable accuracy, particularly within boundary regions. The proposed method surpasses other particular networks (U-NetPlus, PsPNet and DeepLabV3 +) across all evaluation criteria and achieves values of 0.9513 and 0.8472 for the F1-score in WHU and Massachusetts dataset, respectively. Utilizing the suggested boundary loss function (Loss_ITN) during network training resulted in a notable increase of 0.59 in the IOU index of the WHU dataset compared to the training solely reliant on Loss_CE. Moreover, a remarkable 0.46 improvement was achieved in the IOU index of the Massachusetts dataset.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know