Performance of deep learning models for response evaluation on whole-body bone scans in prostate cancer
Annals of Nuclear Medicine, ISSN: 1864-6433, Vol: 37, Issue: 12, Page: 685-694
2023
- 2Citations
- 11Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations2
- Citation Indexes2
- Captures11
- Readers11
- 11
Article Description
Objective: We aimed to develop deep learning classifiers for assessing therapeutic response on bone scans of patients with prostate cancer. Methods: A set of 3791 consecutive bone scans coupled with their last previous scan (1528 patients) was evaluated. Bone scans were labeled as “progression” or “nonprogression” on the basis of clinical reports and image review. A 2D-convolutional neural network architecture was trained with three different preprocessing methods: 1) no preprocessing (Raw), 2) spatial normalization (SN), and 3) spatial and count normalization (SCN). Data were allocated into training, validation, and test sets in the ratio of 72:8:20, with the 20% independent test set rotating all scans over a five-fold testing procedure. A Grad-CAM algorithm was employed to generate class activation maps to visualize the lesions contributing to the decision. Diagnostic performance was compared using area under the receiver operating characteristics curves (AUCs). Results: The data consisted of 791 scans labeled as “progression” and 3000 scans labeled as “nonprogression.” The AUCs of the classifiers were 0.632–0.710 on the Raw dataset, were significantly higher with the use of SN at 0.784–0.854 (p < 0.001 for Raw versus SN), and higher still with SCN at 0.954–0.979 (p < 0.001 for SN versus SCN). Class activation maps of the SCN model visualized lesions contributing to the model’s decision of progression. Conclusion: With preprocessing of spatial and count normalization, our deep learning model achieved excellent performance in classifying the therapeutic response of bone scans in patients with prostate cancer.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85173823042&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12149-023-01872-7; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37819584; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12149-023-01872-7; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12149-023-01872-7; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12149-023-01872-7
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know