Properties of [F]FAPI monitoring of acute radiation pneumonia versus [F]FDG in mouse models
Annals of Nuclear Medicine, ISSN: 1864-6433, Vol: 38, Issue: 5, Page: 360-368
2024
- 1Citations
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Citation Indexes1
Article Description
Objective: In this study, the uptake characteristics of [F]fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) molecular imaging probe were investigated in acute radiation pneumonia and lung cancer xenografted mice before and after radiation to assess the future applicability of [F]FAPI positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging in early radiotherapy response. Methods: Initially, the biodistribution of [F]FAPI tracer in vivo were studied in healthy mice at each time-point. A comparison of [F]FAPI and [F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT imaging efficacy in normal ICR, LLC tumor-bearing mice was evaluated. A radiation pneumonia model was then investigated using a gamma counter, small animal PET/CT, and autoradiography. The uptake properties of [F]FAPI in lung cancer and acute radiation pneumonia were investigated using autoradiography and PET/CT imaging in mice. Results: The tumor area was visible in [F]FAPI imaging and the tracer was swiftly eliminated from normal tissues and organs. There was a significant increase of [F]FDG absorption in lung tissue after radiotherapy compared to before radiotherapy, but no significant difference of [F]FAPI uptake under the same condition. Furthermore, both the LLC tumor volume and the expression of FAP-ɑ decreased after thorax irradiation. Correspondingly, there was no notable [F]FAPI uptake after irradiation, but there was an increase of [F]FDG uptake in malignancies and lungs. Conclusions: The background uptake of [F]FAPI is negligible. Moreover, the uptake of [F]FAPI may not be affected by acute radiation pneumonitis compared to [F]FDG, which may be used to more accurately evaluate early radiotherapy response of lung cancer with acute radiation pneumonia.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85185976598&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12149-024-01903-x; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38407800; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12149-024-01903-x; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12149-024-01903-x; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12149-024-01903-x
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know