Validation of an Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) Test Kit for Determination of Aflatoxin B in Corn Feed and Comparison with Liquid-Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) Method
Food Analytical Methods, ISSN: 1936-976X, Vol: 13, Issue: 9, Page: 1806-1816
2020
- 13Citations
- 11Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Animal feed is a potential route for contaminants like mycotoxins to enter into the human food chain. Hence, close monitoring is fundamental and should be performed with adequate analytical methods. In this study, a commercial ELISA kit for aflatoxin B detection in feed corn samples, RIDASCREEN® Aflatoxin B1 30/15, was assessed by the evaluation of some performance parameters. Basically, the following results were achieved: limit of detection of 1.1 μg/kg and limit of quantification of 2.5 μg/kg; repeatability of 9.3%; 18.0% of intermediate precision; trueness of 101.8%; relative expanded uncertainty of ± 0.46 μg/kg; cut-off value of 14 μg/kg and a very low rate of false suspect results, for screening. In addition, specific requirements for the appliance of this kit as a screening method at the concentration of 20 μg/kg were also determined. Lastly, corn samples were analysed with the kit and with an LC-MS/MS method, and the results were compared. Among the 40 corn samples analysed, only one sample was contaminated with a quantifiable aflatoxin B content. The results obtained with the ELISA kit were confirmed by LC-MS/MS. [Figure not available: see fulltext.]
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85086781034&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12161-020-01805-4; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12161-020-01805-4; https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12161-020-01805-4.pdf; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12161-020-01805-4/fulltext.html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12161-020-01805-4; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12161-020-01805-4
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know