Qualitative and Quantitative Detection of Monofloral, Polyfloral, and Honeydew Honeys Adulteration by Employing Mid-Infrared Spectroscopy and Chemometrics
Food Analytical Methods, ISSN: 1936-976X, Vol: 15, Issue: 8, Page: 2274-2289
2022
- 5Citations
- 36Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In this study, the potential of mid-infrared (MIR) spectroscopy complemented with chemometrics for the qualitative and quantitative detection of monofloral, polyfloral, and honeydew honeys adulteration (acacia, black cumin, carob, citrus, chestnut, lavender, linden, milk vetch, rhododendron, sunflower, thistle, thyme, honeydew, oak, and polyfloral honeys) was reported. A total of 311 honey samples (adulterated honeys with sugar syrups (2% to 50%) and pure honeys) were analyzed the spectral range of 4000–650 cm. MIR data were analyzed by application of supervised and unsupervised multivariate data analyses including principle component analysis (PCA), hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA), soft independent modeling of class analogies (SIMCA), and partial least square-regression (PLS-R) analyses, by using full and characteristic wavenumber regions. The SIMCA models prescribed an excellent classification for pure honey samples of different botanical origins, and the classification limits for detecting sugar syrups added to honey samples were better than 2%. The PLS-R plots exhibited excellent predictions (R > 0.9993), and the forecast calibration and validation parameters (RMSEC and RMSECV) were found as 0.4413–3.3104% and 0.6487–4.0374%, respectively. Thus, the MIR methods in conjunction with chemometrics developed here could be employed to estimate the amount of sugar syrup adulterant present at levels < 0.44% in unknown honey samples.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know