Re-examination of Metabolic Fluxes in Escherichia coli during Anaerobic Fermentation of Glucose Using C Labeling Experiments and 2-dimensional Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) Spectroscopy
Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering, ISSN: 1226-8372, Vol: 16, Issue: 3, Page: 419-437
2011
- 17Citations
- 36Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Improved design of metabolic flux estimation using mixed label C labeling experiments and identifiability analysis motivated re-examination of metabolic fluxes during anaerobic fermentation in the Escherichia coli. Comprehensive metabolic flux maps were determined by using a mixture of differently labeled glucose and compared to conventional flux maps obtained using extracellular measurements and comprehensive metabolic flux maps obtained using only U- C glucose as the substrate. As expected, conventional flux analysis performs poorly in comparison to C-MFA, especially in the Embden-Meyerhof- Parnas (EMP) and pentose phosphate (PP) pathways. Identifiability analysis indicated and experiments confirmed that a mixture of 10% U-l3C glucose, 25% 1- C glucose, and 65% naturally labeled glucose significantly improved the statistical quality of all calculated fluxes in the PP pathway, the EMP pathway, the anaplerotic reactions, and the tricarboxylic acid cycle. Modifying the network topology for the presence and absence of the Entner-Doudoroff pathway and the glyoxylate shunt did not affect the value or quality of estimated fluxes significantly. Extracellular measurement of formate production was necessary for the accurate estimation of the fluxes around the formate node. © The Korean Society for Biotechnology and Bioengineering and Springer 2011.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=80052441741&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12257-010-0449-5; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12257-010-0449-5; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12257-010-0449-5; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12257-010-0449-5.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12257-010-0449-5/fulltext.html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12257-010-0449-5; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12257-010-0449-5; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s12257-010-0449-5; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/s12257-010-0449-5
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know