Optimization of reconstruction and quantification of motion-corrected coronary PET-CT
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, ISSN: 1071-3581, Vol: 27, Issue: 2, Page: 494-504
2020
- 37Citations
- 34Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations37
- Citation Indexes37
- 37
- CrossRef31
- Captures34
- Readers34
- 34
Article Description
Coronary PET shows promise in the detection of high-risk atherosclerosis, but there remains a need to optimize imaging and reconstruction techniques. We investigated the impact of reconstruction parameters and cardiac motion-correction in 18 F Sodium Fluoride ( 18 F-NaF) PET. Twenty-two patients underwent 18 F-NaF PET within 22 days of an acute coronary syndrome. Optimal reconstruction parameters were determined in a subgroup of six patients. Motion-correction was performed on ECG-gated data of all patients with optimal reconstruction. Tracer uptake was quantified in culprit and reference lesions by computing signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in diastolic, summed, and motion-corrected images. Reconstruction using 24 subsets, 4 iterations, point-spread-function modelling, time of flight, and 5-mm post-filtering provided the highest median SNR (31.5) compared to 4 iterations 0-mm (22.5), 8 iterations 0-mm (21.1), and 8 iterations 5-mm (25.6; all P <.05). Motion-correction improved SNR of culprit lesions ( n = 33) (24.5[19.9-31.5]) compared to diastolic (15.7[12.4-18.1]; P <.001) and summed data (22.1[18.9-29.2]; P <.001). Motion-correction increased the SNR difference between culprit and reference lesions (10.9[6.3-12.6]) compared to diastolic (6.2[3.6-10.3]; P =.001) and summed data (7.1 [4.8-11.6]; P =.001). The number of iterations and extent of post-filtering has marked effects on coronary 18 F-NaF PET quantification. Cardiac motion-correction improves discrimination between culprit and reference lesions.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1071358123017968; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12350-018-1317-5; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85048357954&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29948889; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1071358123017968; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12350-018-1317-5
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know