PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

Quantitative 99m Tc-DPD-SPECT/CT assessment of cardiac amyloidosis

Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, ISSN: 1071-3581, Vol: 30, Issue: 1, Page: 101-111
2023
  • 21
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 30
    Captures
  • 0
    Mentions
  • 0
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

Article Description

Transthyretin (ATTR) amyloidosis is responsible for the majority of cardiac amyloidosis (CA) cases and can be reliably diagnosed with bone scintigraphy and the visual Perugini score. We aimed to implement a quantification method of cardiac amyloid deposits in patients with suspected cardiac amyloidosis and to compare performance to visual scoring. 136 patients received 99m Tc-DPD-bone scintigraphy including SPECT/CT of the thorax in case of suspicion of cardiac amyloidosis. Imaging phantom studies were performed to determine the scaling factor for standardized uptake value (SUV) quantification from SPECT/CT. Myocardial tracer uptake was quantified in a whole heart volume of interest. Forty-five patients were diagnosed with CA. A strong relationship between cardiac SUVmax and Perugini score was found (Spearman r 0.75, p < 0.0001). Additionally, tracer uptake in bone decreased with increasing cardiac SUVmax and Perugini score ( p < 0.0001). ROC analysis revealed good performance of the SUVmax for the detection of ATTR-CA with AUC of 0.96 ± 0.02 ( p < 0.0001) with sensitivity 98.7% and specificity 87.2%. We demonstrate an accessible and accurate quantitative SPECT approach in CA. Quantitative assessment of the cardiac tracer uptake may improve diagnostic accuracy and risk classification. This method may enable monitoring and assessment of therapy response in patients with ATTR amyloidosis.

Bibliographic Details

Kessler, Lukas; Fragoso Costa, Pedro; Kersting, David; Jentzen, Walter; Weber, Manuel; Lüdike, Peter; Carpinteiro, Alexander; Oubari, Sara; Hagenacker, Tim; Thimm, Andreas; Rassaf, Tienush; Herrmann, Ken; Papathanasiou, Maria; Rischpler, Christoph

Elsevier BV

Medicine

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know