A Novel Model Proposal and Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning Techniques for Classifying Cercospora beticola and Erysiphe betae Diseases on Sugar Beet Leaves
Sugar Tech, ISSN: 0974-0740, Vol: 26, Issue: 5, Page: 1487-1499
2024
- 5Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures5
- Readers5
Article Description
This study introduces a novel approach utilizing a convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture for the detection and classification of Cercospora beticola and Erysiphe betae diseases, aiming to enhance both the quantity and quality of sugar beet yield, a pivotal commodity in agriculture. The research focuses on disease identification and plant categorization, leveraging deep learning (DL) techniques for sustainable agricultural practices. Delayed detection and treatment of these diseases pose significant threats to harvest productivity, emphasizing the importance of timely intervention. Timely and accurate disease detection is crucial for improving sugar beet yield and quality for agricultural production. This study employed DL methods to classify sugar beet leaf images into healthy or diseased categories, followed by sub-classification into Cercospora beticola or Erysiphe betae. The proposed model's efficacy was evaluated through comparative analysis with established models such as the Visual Geometry Group networks (VGG16 and VGG19), InceptionV3, AlexNet, and ResNet50, renowned for their robust performance in image classification tasks. The dataset consisted of 4128 samples covering healthy and diseased sugar beet leaves, further classified as Cercospora beticola and Erysiphe betae. Additionally, the performance of the proposed model was compared with other models in terms of train time. Remarkably, although transfer learning is not implemented in the proposed model, it achieves 98% accuracy, 96% precision, 100% recall, and 98% F1-score, exceeding transfer learning models. This study advocates adopting a CNN model with a light-weight structure, facilitates rapid assembly, and has high recognition sensitivity of disease classification.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know