Application of multifractal modeling technique in systematic lithogeochemical survey to identify Au–Cu anomalies in the Siah-Jangal area, Southeastern of Iran
Arabian Journal of Geosciences, ISSN: 1866-7538, Vol: 8, Issue: 11, Page: 9517-9530
2015
- 4Citations
- 12Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Identifying the geochemical anomalies from background is a fundamental task in exploration geochemistry. This research is based on the application of concentration–area (C–A) method at the Siah-Jangal Au porphyry system in southeastern Iran. Lithogeochemical datasets (n = 399) were used in this geochemical survey which was conducted for the exploration for Au mineralization. Moreover, similar surveys were also carried out for As, Cu, and Mo exploration in this region. Anomalous threshold values for the mineralized zone were computed and compared with the statistical methods based on the data obtained from chemical analysis of samples for the lithological units. Several anomalies at a local scale were identified for Au (281 ppb), As (649 ppm), and Cu (20 ppm). The obtained results suggest existence of local Au anomalies that its magnitude generally is above 400 ppb. The C–A log–log plots show existence of three stages of Au and Cu enrichment. The second and most important enrichment event is responsible for the presence of Au at grades above 400 ppb. The obtained results have been interpreted using rather extensive set of information available for the study area, consisting of structural interpretation and alteration data. Various structural features and corresponding alteration show that the geologic structures play an important role in the discrimination of geochemical anomalies and element distribution in the Siah-Jangal area.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84945480460&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12517-015-1860-1; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12517-015-1860-1; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12517-015-1860-1; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12517-015-1860-1.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12517-015-1860-1/fulltext.html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12517-015-1860-1; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12517-015-1860-1
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know