Comparative Analysis of Different Methods for Extracting Water Body Area of Miyun Reservoir and Driving Forces for Nearly 40 Years
Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, ISSN: 0974-3006, Vol: 48, Issue: 3, Page: 451-463
2020
- 15Citations
- 10Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The Miyun Reservoir is the most important source of drinking water in Beijing, China. Based on the Landsat satellite series image, this paper compared four index methods (NDWI, RNDWI, MNDWI, AWEIsh-superimposed MNDWI) to extract the water body area of Miyun Reservoir from 1979 to 2018 to study its changes in the past 40 years. Furthermore, the internal and external driving forces of reservoir water body area change are studied by correlation analysis and catastrophe analysis. Compared to the characteristic curve of reservoir area calculation, it indicated that the AWEIsh-superimposed MNDWI method has the highest accuracy. The statistical, temporal and spatial analysis showed that the water body area changes of Miyun Reservoir are mainly divided into four distinct stages: (1) It increased in 1979–1997, which was mainly due to the increase in precipitation and the low level of economic development. In 1997, the maximum value (161.14 km) was reached, which was 108.64 km higher than the minimum value. (2) It shrank rapidly in 1997–2004. The areas had dropped by 101.61 km. By 2004, it was 59.61 km. The main reason is that the reservoir has suffered from persistent drought for many years after discharging water. (3) It maintained at a lower water level in 2004–2015, with an average annual area of 78 km. The reason is the low precipitation and rapid economic development. (4) It grew rapidly after 2015, mainly due to water from the South-to-North Water Transfer Project, coupled with the increased precipitation. By 2018, the water body area reached 125.42 km.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know