Food safety and security and the dose-response
Food Security, ISSN: 1876-4525, Vol: 5, Issue: 1, Page: 95-102
2013
- 1Citations
- 17Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Getting the dose-response right is a critical component in the assessment of chemical food safety. Being able to validate dose-response model predictions in the low-dose zone would be a critical aspect of the assurances that correct decisions about food safety and security are made. The present paper examines the history of the threshold dose-response model and how it became incorporated into governmental regulatory and risk assessment activities, including those affecting chemical food safety. The present analysis reveals that the major risk assessment models used by international regulatory agencies, such as the threshold dose-response model, were never validated prior to their acceptance and use by international regulatory agencies. Furthermore, once they were tested both the threshold and linear dose-response models failed to make accurate predictions in the low-dose zone. The only model providing accurate predictions in the low dose zone was the hormetic dose-response, a model not used by regulatory agencies. The present analysis raises important new questions for the risk assessment process in general and that of chemical food security in particular. © 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht and International Society for Plant Pathology.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know