PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

Comparison of tracheal versus esophageal temperatures during laparoscopic surgery

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, ISSN: 1496-8975, Vol: 71, Issue: 5, Page: 619-628
2024
  • 0
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 12
    Captures
  • 0
    Mentions
  • 0
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

Article Description

Purpose: Recently, endotracheal tubes with an embedded temperature sensor in the inner surface of the tube cuff (temperature tracheal tubes) have been developed. We sought to assess whether temperature tracheal tubes show a good agreement with esophageal temperature probes during surgery. Methods: We enrolled 40 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery in an observational study. The tracheas of all patients were intubated with a temperature tracheal tube, and an esophageal temperature probe was inserted into the esophagus. Tracheal and esophageal temperatures were recorded at 15-min intervals until the end of surgery. Temperatures from both devices were analyzed using Bland–Altman analysis, four-quadrant plots, and polar plots. Results: We analyzed 261 data points from 36 patients. Temperatures ranges were 34.2 °C to 36.6 °C for the tracheal temperature tube and 34.7 °C to 37.2 °C for the esophageal temperature probe. Bland–Altman analysis showed an acceptable agreement between the two devices, with an overall mean bias (95% limit of agreement) of −0.3 °C (−0.8 °C to 0.1 °C) and a percentage error of 3%; the trending ability (temperature changes over time) between the two devices showed a concordance rate of 94% in four-quadrant plot (cut-off ≥ 92%), but this was higher than the acceptable mean angular bias of 177° (cut-off < ± 5°) and radial limits of agreement of 52° (cut-off < ± 30°) in the polar plot. Bronchoscopy during extubation and patient interviews at six hours postoperatively revealed no serious injuries related to the use of the temperature tracheal tube. Conclusion: The temperature tracheal tube showed an acceptable overall mean bias of −0.3 °C and a percentage error of 3%, but incompatible trending ability with the esophageal temperature probe. Study registration: cris.nih.go.kr (KCT0007265); 22 April 2022.

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know