A hybrid intelligent model for assessment of critical success factors in high-risk emergency system
Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, ISSN: 1868-5145, Vol: 9, Issue: 6, Page: 1933-1953
2018
- 103Citations
- 64Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
High-risk emergency systems are emerging as a new generation technology to prevent disasters. Latest research points out that these systems could protect properties and lives in an efficient way. Limited to the sources, the feasible way to improve the performance of the system is to identify critical success factors (CSFs) and then optimize them. In this paper, a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach integrating Affinity Diagram, Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL), fuzzy cognitive map (FCM) and Dempster–Shafer evidence theory (evidence theory) is proposed to identify critical success factors in high-risk emergency system. The DEMATEL and FCM are initially combined to tackle the decision-making problem in theory and practice. This model has ability to fuse technical, economic, political and social attributes. The proposed method is applied to select CSFs for Chongqing city.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know