Q-rung orthopair fuzzy multiple attribute group decision-making method based on normalized bidirectional projection model and generalized knowledge-based entropy measure
Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, ISSN: 1868-5145, Vol: 12, Issue: 2, Page: 2715-2730
2021
- 37Citations
- 10Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The q-rung orthopair fuzzy sets (q-ROFSs) can serve as a generalization of intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IFSs) and Pythagorean fuzzy sets (PFSs). q-ROFSs provide more freedom for decision makers in describing their opinions than other ordinary orthopair fuzzy sets. In this paper, a novel multiple attribute group decision making(MAGDM) method is constructed under q-rung orthopair fuzzy (q-ROF) environment. First, considering the projection measure provides the distance and the angle between two alternatives simultaneously, this work investigates a new normalized bidirectional projection model (NBPM) of q-ROFSs. By combining the proposed NBPM with Jaynes maximum entropy method, a nonlinear programming model is constructed to calculate the objective attribute weight information. Second, we present a new entropy measure based on the proposed generalized p-norm knowledge-based measure which takes into account both the membership and non-membership functions and the inherent fuzziness of q-ROFSs. Then the weights of decision makers are given by the proposed entropy measure. Furthermore, an integrated MAGDM framework is presented by using the weight determination methods of decision makers and attributes under q-ROF environment. Finally, an illustrative example is given to illustrate the operation process of the proposed decision-making method, sensitivity analysis and comparison analysis are also performed to show the effectiveness and superiority of the proposed method.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85089258427&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-02433-w; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12652-020-02433-w; https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12652-020-02433-w.pdf; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12652-020-02433-w/fulltext.html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-02433-w; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12652-020-02433-w
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know