MDDC: melanoma detection using discrete wavelet transform and convolutional neural network
Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, ISSN: 1868-5145, Vol: 14, Issue: 9, Page: 12959-12966
2023
- 2Citations
- 6Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Detection of melanoma in the early stage can provide the patients with more promising treatments. Numerous methods have been proposed for detecting melanoma using computational approaches; however, the application of deep learning in this field is incipient and needs to be assessed further. In this paper, we introduce MDDC, a four-step deep learning-based pipeline for melanoma detection using digital images. MDDC removes image noise using discrete wavelet transform, pre-processes and extends the generalizability using a Gaussian blur filter and image transformation techniques, and finally computes the probability of melanoma in digital images using a convolutional neural network. The model performance is evaluated by considering various CNN architectures and three validation scenarios to find the best CNN architecture. Moreover, we used the transfer learning technique to improve the model performance and generalize it for working on another dataset. MDDC can handle noisy images and is insensitive to image transformations. The validation of MDDC led to 0.96 Accuracy, 0.96 Recall, 0.954 Specificity, 0.99 AUC, and 0.99 AUPR. In addition, further evaluation of the proposed method with state-of-the-art methods verifies that MDDC outperforms other methods. Consequently, MDDC can efficiently and quickly detect melanoma in digital images.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know