Prostate-Specific Antigen: a Review of Assay Techniques, Variability and Their Clinical Implications
BioNanoScience, ISSN: 2191-1649, Vol: 8, Issue: 2, Page: 707-712
2018
- 4Citations
- 15Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is used worldwide in the detection and management of prostate cancer. Its discovery revolutionised the care of patients with prostate cancer, but there remains a question of why inter-assay variability exists and how significantly this affects the decision-making process in the care of patients with the disease. We conducted a literature review to evaluate the two areas: inter-assay variability and its relation to clinical practice. Our results show there are internationally recognised standard assays, and the variability of assays are reliant on local/national calibration to a set standard preparation and rely on the measurement of different isoforms of PSA on an equimolar basis. Inter-assay variability exists and can be as high as 8%, which has differing impacts on decision making for diagnostic procedures and treatment modalities depending on the clinical circumstances and PSA level.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know