An improved method for identifying the genotypic sex in Rana dybowskii
Conservation Genetics Resources, ISSN: 1877-7260
2024
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Screening for sex-specific markers via PCR is a common method for identifying the genotypic sex of amphibians. Previously, we employed TRAP‒PCR and polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis to effectively amplify two male-specific markers (222 bp and 261 bp) in Rana dybowskii. However, polyacrylamide gels contain hazardous substances that endanger human health and pollute the environment. Agarose gel is superior to polyacrylamide gel and contains no toxic chemicals, making it suitable for the contamination-free detection of PCR products. To obtain more primers that amplify male-specific bands in R. dybowskii DNA and yield amplification products that can be detected via agarose gel electrophoresis, seven pairs of primers were designed to amplify new male-specific markers that should be within the parameters of two previously identified male-specific bands (222 bp and 261 bp sequences). Among the primers tested, the 222–1 F/222-1R primer pair amplified a 192 bp male-specific fragment and yielded the greatest clarity, with bright, easily visualized bands. To evaluate its effectiveness for the identification of the genotypic sex of R. dybowskii, this primer pair was used to amplify a male-specific DNA marker in three R. dybowskii populations from Xinglong, Huadian and Dandong. The results showed that the primer pair 222–1 F/222-1R amplified a stable male-specific marker (192 bp) in male individuals from three populations. In conclusion, our findings suggest that the revised method is a dependable, efficient, and nontoxic strategy.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know