Updating and refining a study brochure for a cancer registry-based study of BRCA mutations among young African American breast cancer patients: Lessons learned
Journal of Community Genetics, ISSN: 1868-310X, Vol: 1, Issue: 2, Page: 63-71
2010
- 10Citations
- 8Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations10
- Citation Indexes10
- CrossRef10
- 10
- Captures8
- Readers8
Article Description
The aim of the present study was to update, refine, and evaluate a study brochure to promote participation in a population-based study of BRCA mutations among AA women with a personal history of early-onset breast cancer. A multi-step approach was used to develop this brochure and included: (1) feedback from community members (through a Community Advisory Panel (CAP)) to develop and refine the study brochure, (2) pilot testing of materials with the target audience, and (3) review of pilot testing results with the CAP. Based on the feedback received at each step, the study brochure was refined. In phase 1, the major changes included emphasizing the concept of leaving a legacy and family, using the terms Black and women of color, and use of patient vignettes and photos. In phase 2, attraction and cultural acceptability were identified as two areas for improvement in the study brochure. These results demonstrate that involvement of community members and target study population in the development of a study-specific brochure can provide invaluable feedback to optimize recruitment strategies. This approach can be readily adapted to develop study recruitment materials for individuals from a variety of cultural and ethnic backgrounds. © Springer-Verlag 2010.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=79951969446&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12687-010-0010-4; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22460206; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12687-010-0010-4; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12687-010-0010-4; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12687-010-0010-4; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s12687-010-0010-4; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/s12687-010-0010-4
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know