Weakly supervised multi-label feature selection based on shared subspace
International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, ISSN: 1868-808X
2024
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Multi-label feature selection (MLFS) improves classification accuracy and alleviates the curse of dimensionality by retaining relevant features and eliminating redundant and irrelevant features. However, the incompleteness of the label space not only makes the models difficult to learn the latent structure of the label space, but also leads to the unreliability of correlation between the labels and features. Therefore, it is essential and difficult how to discover the credible correlation information between the features and labels, so as to enable the effective selection of the key feature subset by the algorithms learning from multi-label data with missing labels. To more effectively excavate the implicit shared information within the feature matrix and the label matrix, we propose a novel MLFS method named WSMF which combines the feature matrix and the label matrix together to identify vital feature subsets in the absence of a large portion of labeled data. First, we utilize joint matrix factorization to uncover a low-dimensional shared mode between the feature matrix and the label matrix, thereby diminishing the effect of incomplete label information. Second, we employ non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) to enhance the interpretability of the succeeding feature selection process. Additionally, we employ the structural consistency assumption to retrieve the absent labels and incorporate l-norm to control the feature redundancy and irrelevant features. In the end, we conduct experiments on 14 datasets to distinctly explain the effectiveness of WSMF against other established algorithms.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know