Does the Incremental Value of I-Metaiodobenzylguanidine SPECT/CT over Planar Imaging Justify the Increase in Radiation Exposure?
Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, ISSN: 1869-3482, Vol: 55, Issue: 4, Page: 173-180
2021
- 2Citations
- 4Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Purpose: Planar scintigraphy with I-radiolabeled metaiodobenzylguanidine (I-mIBG) is an important imaging modality to evaluate neuroblastoma. In recent years, Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography combined with Computed Tomography (SPECT/CT) has revolutionized nuclear medicine. Nevertheless, the addition of the CT has increased the patients' irradiation. We aimed to evaluate the incremental benefits of I-mIBG SPECT/CT over conventional planar imaging and to estimate the relative increase of radiation dose. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the added value of 56 SPECT/CT performed in 40 children in terms of better characterization of the lesion and its locoregional extension, better lymph node staging, detection of new lesions, and elimination of false positives by a paired comparison between the planar images and the SPECT/CT ones. Then, we calculated the percentage contribution of the additional radiation of the CT in this hybrid imagery. Results: In 88% (49 out of 56) of the examinations, SPECT/CT provided additional information, which was crucial in 20% of the cases. It allowed a better characterization of the lesion and its locoregional extension in 44 cases, a better lymph node staging in 28 cases, the detection of 33 new lesions, and the elimination of 9 false positives. The CT effective dose was significantly lower than the SPECT one. The average additional radiation exposure due to CT was 12% (4–23%). Conclusion: I-mIBG SPECT/CT has an undeniable added value that improves planar imaging interpretation and impacts patient management. These potential benefits would justify the low additional radiation induced by the CT.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85109277641&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13139-021-00707-5; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34422127; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13139-021-00707-5; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13139-021-00707-5; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13139-021-00707-5
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know