Determining change of density with depth by using seismic velocity boundaries in 2D gravity inversion calculations
Carbonates and Evaporites, ISSN: 1878-5212, Vol: 30, Issue: 2, Page: 145-151
2015
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures1
- Readers1
Article Description
Densities in formations are usually assumed to be constant for gravity model calculations. This constancy implies that formations are homogeneous and isotropic. However, formations are usually heterogeneous, and densities vary depending on heterogeneity. For this reason, densities should be considered variables. Some scientists consider densities as variables in their model calculations of each formation. In other words, density is defined as a variable of the required parameters. In fact, variable change is regular, whereas density is an irregular variable that depends on the change boundaries of seismic velocity. This study aimed to take density into account as a variable by using determined seismic velocity boundaries at which the seismic velocity changes for each formation. The change boundaries of seismic velocity are an indication of the change of density in the formation. It is not possible for the respective description of this change to be variable for each point. In addition to defining the main formations in model geometry by using 2D inversion calculations, this study defined another formation, which is described with a combination of all of the change boundaries of seismic velocity that are present in each formation in a specific order. The reliability of the results of the method depends on the reliability of the seismic velocity boundaries. Moreover, an increasing number of seismic velocity boundaries lead to a higher resolution of density variations.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84929706157&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13146-014-0192-7; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13146-014-0192-7; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13146-014-0192-7; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13146-014-0192-7.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13146-014-0192-7/fulltext.html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13146-014-0192-7; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13146-014-0192-7
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know