Conventional and contemporary luting cements: An overview
Journal of Indian Prosthodontist Society, ISSN: 0972-4052, Vol: 10, Issue: 2, Page: 79-88
2010
- 47Citations
- 193Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations47
- Citation Indexes47
- 47
- CrossRef37
- Captures193
- Readers193
- 193
- Mentions1
- References1
- Wikipedia1
Review Description
Long-term clinical success of fixed prosthodontic restorations is influenced by many factors, one important factor being the selection of an appropriate luting agent. No single luting agent is capable of meeting all the stringent requirements, which is one reason why there is such a wide choice of luting agents currently available from conventional water-based to contemporary adhesive resin cements. Introduction of adhesive resin systems has completely changed the face of fixed prosthodontic practice leading to an increased use of bonded all-ceramic crowns and resin-retained fixed partial dentures. This article makes an effort to review various conventional and contemporary luting agents, their properties & associated clinical implications thereby trying to help the clinician select an appropriate luting agent for a given clinical situation. © Indian Prosthodontic Society 2010.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=79954628078&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13191-010-0022-0; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21629449; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13191-010-0022-0; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs13191-010-0022-0; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s13191-010-0022-0; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13191-010-0022-0; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13191-010-0022-0; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/s13191-010-0022-0
Medknow
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know