Umbilical Coiling Index Assessment During Routine Fetal Anatomic Survey: A Screening Tool for Fetuses at Risk
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, ISSN: 0975-6434, Vol: 68, Issue: 5, Page: 369-375
2018
- 7Citations
- 31Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations7
- Citation Indexes7
- Captures31
- Readers31
- 31
Article Description
Background: The umbilical cord is the lifeline of the foetus as it supplies water, nutrients, and oxygen. Protection of these blood vessels is needed and provided by Wharton’s Jelly, amniotic fluid and the helical pattern, or coiling, of the umbilical cord vessels. Aim: To establish the relationship between antenatal umbilical cord coiling index (aUCI) measured at 18–20 weeks along with level II USG and adverse perinatal outcomes. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 408 antenatal women, enrolled at the time of fetal anatomic survey, and their cord coiling index (aUCI) was measured, and its association with perinatal outcomes was observed. Umbilical coiling index was classified as Hypocoiled if UCI <10th percentile, hypercoiled >90th percentile, normocoiled between 10th and 90th percentile. Results: 408 antenatal women were enrolled for the study. Mean aUCI was 0.43 ± 0.30 (normocoiled group), 0.18 ± 0.4 (hypocoiled), and 0.53 ± 0.05 (hypercoiled group). The average gestational age at delivery in hypocoiled group was 36.8 ± 2.34 weeks, and it was shorter than 38.3 ± 1.82 weeks of the normocoiled group and 38.9 ± 1.72 weeks of the hypercoiled group. Mean birth weight observed was 2055 ± 744 (hypocoiled group), 3049 ± 564 (hypercoiled), and 3102 ± 564 (normocoiled) p < 0.001. Preterm births 52 (59%) and low birth weight 76 (69%) were significantly associated with hypocoiling. Conclusion: Abnormal umbilical cord coiling index, detected at the fetal ultrasound anatomic survey in the second trimester (18–20 weeks), can be used potentially as a screening or as a predictive tool for adverse antenatal or perinatal events.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85029535878&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13224-017-1046-8; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30224841; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13224-017-1046-8; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13224-017-1046-8; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13224-017-1046-8
Springer Nature America, Inc
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know