Unsteady surface pressures measured at a pitching Lambda wing with vortex dominated flow and transonic effects
CEAS Aeronautical Journal, ISSN: 1869-5590, Vol: 9, Issue: 3, Page: 417-427
2018
- 4Citations
- 2Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In the Transonic Wind Tunnel Göttingen, pitch oscillations were performed with a Lambda wing to study unsteady pressure distributions of vortex dominated flow including transonic effects. The free stream Mach number was varied between 0.3 and 0.7. Small pitching amplitudes of 0. 08 –0. 4 at excitation frequencies up to 40 Hz were used. In this paper, particularly the data of unsteady Pressure Sensitive Paint measurements and unsteady pressure sensors are analyzed. With increasing angle of attack, a suction peak and a shock occur near the leading edge. Then a shock-induced separation triggers the development of a vortex at the main wing. The unsteady pressures show: for lower angles of attack, the transonic influences are dominant. For higher angles of attack, the influence of the vortex becomes of similar magnitude and dominates the behavior of the pressure variations. The shock exhibits, with increasing angle of attack, an inverse motion. For angles of attack beyond the maximum lift, the unsteady pressure distributions and the lift show a significant phase lag, already at very low oscillation frequencies. Compared to subsonic cases, the supersonic region shifts the vortex induced pressures downstream.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85051825489&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13272-018-0293-4; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13272-018-0293-4; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13272-018-0293-4.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13272-018-0293-4/fulltext.html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13272-018-0293-4; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13272-018-0293-4
Springer Nature
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know