Active flutter suppression for light sport aircraft by a control surface split
CEAS Aeronautical Journal, ISSN: 1869-5590, Vol: 15, Issue: 4, Page: 977-998
2024
- 6Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures6
- Readers6
Article Description
A new method of active flutter suppression is present in the paper and aims at the Light Sport Aircraft category, where it has never been used, designed, or even considered. The novelty of the method lies in splitting the control surface into a part controlled by a pilot with purely mechanical control and into a part controlled by a servo-actuator with a controller. The control law of the actuator is designed to follow the pilot-controlled part of the control surfaces and damp unstable oscillations if they occur. The controller design for flutter suppression is focused on achieving simple solutions. The request for simplicity is important for easy acquisition of airworthiness during a certification process and easy implementation by producers. The contribution of this paper also lies in the analysis of flutter suppression capability based on the varying active control surface span. The results show that it is not necessary to use the entire area of a control surface for active flutter suppression. A mathematical model based on a real aircraft is developed and verified for the simulation of active flutter suppression. In addition, control law design and simulations of the dynamic response are performed. The robustness of the control law and aircraft controllability in the case of active control surface malfunction is investigated.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know