PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

Active afforestation of drained peatlands is not a viable option under the EU Nature Restoration Law

Ambio, ISSN: 1654-7209, Vol: 53, Issue: 7, Page: 970-983
2024
  • 5
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 57
    Captures
  • 2
    Mentions
  • 0
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

  • Citations
    5
  • Captures
    57
  • Mentions
    2
    • Blog Mentions
      1
      • 1
    • News Mentions
      1
      • 1

Most Recent Blog

Skeptical Science New Research for Week #19 2024

Open access notables A Global Increase in Nearshore Tropical Cyclone Intensification, Balaguru et al., Earth's Future: Tropical Cyclones (TCs) inflict substantial coastal damages, making it pertinent to understand changing storm characteristics in the important nearshore region. Past work examined several aspects of TCs relevant for impacts in coastal regions. However, few studies explored nearsho

Most Recent News

The need for phasing out peat to reduce climate crises: Latvia’s challenges and opportunities

Story by Maksis Apinis, energy transformation campaigner, Latvia The most significant uses of peat in the world are for the creation of soil substrates and

Article Description

The EU Nature Restoration Law (NRL) is critical for the restoration of degraded ecosystems and active afforestation of degraded peatlands has been suggested as a restoration measure under the NRL. Here, we discuss the current state of scientific evidence on the climate mitigation effects of peatlands under forestry. Afforestation of drained peatlands without restoring their hydrology does not fully restore ecosystem functions. Evidence on long-term climate benefits is lacking and it is unclear whether CO sequestration of forest on drained peatland can offset the carbon loss from the peat over the long-term. While afforestation may offer short-term gains in certain cases, it compromises the sustainability of peatland carbon storage. Thus, active afforestation of drained peatlands is not a viable option for climate mitigation under the EU Nature Restoration Law and might even impede future rewetting/restoration efforts. Instead, restoring hydrological conditions through rewetting is crucial for effective peatland restoration.

Bibliographic Details

Jurasinski, Gerald; Barthelmes, Alexandra; Byrne, Kenneth A; Chojnicki, Bogdan H; Christiansen, Jesper Riis; Decleer, Kris; Fritz, Christian; Günther, Anke Beate; Huth, Vytas; Joosten, Hans; Juszczak, Radosław; Juutinen, Sari; Kasimir, Åsa; Klemedtsson, Leif; Koebsch, Franziska; Kotowski, Wiktor; Kull, Ain; Lamentowicz, Mariusz; Lindgren, Amelie; Lindsay, Richard; Linkevičienė, Rita; Lohila, Annalea; Mander, Ülo; Manton, Michael; Minkkinen, Kari; Peters, Jan; Renou-Wilson, Florence; Sendžikaitė, Jūratė; Šimanauskienė, Rasa; Taminskas, Julius; Tanneberger, Franziska; Tegetmeyer, Cosima; van Diggelen, Rudy; Vasander, Harri; Wilson, David; Zableckis, Nerijus; Zak, Dominik H; Couwenberg, John

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Social Sciences; Environmental Science

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know