Clinical Measures of Disease Progression in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Neurotherapeutics, ISSN: 1878-7479, Vol: 12, Issue: 2, Page: 384-393
2015
- 50Citations
- 135Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations50
- Citation Indexes49
- 49
- CrossRef44
- Policy Citations1
- 1
- Captures135
- Readers135
- 135
Review Description
Progressive weakness remains the clinical hallmark of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Accordingly, a variety of tools has been developed to capture this disease feature, including questionnaires, such as the ALS-functional rating scale, strength testing, pulmonary function tests, electrophysiologic measures, including motor unit number estimation, and imaging techniques. Despite this plethora of approaches, there is little agreement as to what measures to use in a given clinical trial or in the clinic during routine patient care. Part of the reason for this uncertainty is that ALS is a remarkably protean disease. Some individuals progress rapidly, others slowly; some patients have considerable upper motor neuron dysfunction, whereas others have little; and there is considerable variation in the sequence of body regions affected, in some the disease beginning in the bulbar musculature and in others in one arm or one leg. Here, I present a variety of basic and more complex clinical measures for potential use in therapeutic trials with the aim of offering a balanced and practical set of recommendations, as well as considerations for future studies.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878747923008334; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13311-014-0331-9; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84939999236&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25582382; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1878747923008334; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13311-014-0331-9; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs13311-014-0331-9; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13311-014-0331-9; https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs13311-014-0331-9.pdf; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13311-014-0331-9
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know