Propofol versus Fentanyl for Sedation in Pediatric Bronchoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Indian Pediatrics, ISSN: 0974-7559, Vol: 56, Issue: 12, Page: 1011-1016
2019
- 7Citations
- 43Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Objectives: To compare propofol and fentanyl to induce conscious sedation in children undergoing flexible bronchoscopy. Study design: Randomized controlled trial. Setting: Pediatric Pulmonology division at a tertiary care center in Delhi, India. Participants: Children aged 3–15 years who underwent flexible bronchoscopy. Intervention: Children received either intravenous propofol 1 mg/kg administered as a slow bolus over 1 minute followed by 2 mg/kg/hour infusion, or intravenous Fentanyl 2 µg/kg administered as a slow bolus over one minute. Outcomes: Primary outcome was time to achieve conscious sedation (Ramsay score 3). Secondary outcomes were need for adjuvant midazolam, physician satisfaction, level of cough, recovery features, and side-effects in the groups. Results: 53 children (propofol 27, fentanyl 26) were enrolled in the study. The mean (SD) time taken to achieve Ramsay score 03 was lower in propofol than fentanyl [15.7 (4.4) s vs 206 (55) s, P<0.001]. Propofol arm had significantly higher physician satisfaction, less requirement of adjuvant midazolam, less coughing and faster regain of full consciousness. There was no difference in drug side-effects between the groups. Conclusion: Propofol has a shorter sedation induction time, less coughing during procedure, less recovery time, and better physician satisfaction compared to fentanyl for flexible bronchoscopy in children.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85077326165&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13312-019-1681-5; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13312-019-1681-5; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13312-019-1681-5.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13312-019-1681-5/fulltext.html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13312-019-1681-5; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13312-019-1681-5
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know