Relevance of the emergency department’s diagnostic tests according to the guidelines and impact on the emergency length of stay
Annales Francaises de Medecine d'Urgence, ISSN: 2108-6591, Vol: 7, Issue: 1, Page: 7-15
2017
- 1Citations
- 20Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Background: Clinical examination may need to be completed by biological tests. In the Emergency Department (ED), a simplified access to laboratory tests results in an uncorrelated prescription with guidelines. The aim of our study was to assess the relevance of laboratory tests according to the clinical situation. The secondary objective was to assess their impact on the ED length of time. Material and methods: Observational, retrospective, singlecenter study, based on the analysis of computer records, of over 18 years old external patients for one of the following diagnoses: asthma exacerbation, renal colic, acute cystitis, pyelonephritis, suicide attempts by self-poisoning with benzodiazepines, drunkenness, pneumonia (Fine 1), reflex syncope, minor head injury, first convulsive seizure, over a 4-month period. Results: A total of 409 patients were enrolled. Among them, 43% of patients had laboratory test prescriptions adapted to their clinical situation (from 0% in case of renal colic to 89% in case of mild head trauma). Practitioners with more than 5 years of experience respected guidelines less than others (p = 0.02). The complete blood count, plasma electrolytes, and C-reactive protein level determinations were the most frequently prescribed tests. The ED length of stay was significantly shorter if prescription was appropriate to clinical situation (30 [6–130] vs. 170 [68–245] minutes; p < 0.001). Conclusion: A large number of laboratory tests were not recommended for the management of clinical situations encountered. The main impact was an increased ED length of stay.
Bibliographic Details
JLE
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know