Performance of hybrid decomposition algorithm under heavy noise condition for health monitoring of structure
Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring, ISSN: 2190-5479, Vol: 10, Issue: 4, Page: 679-692
2020
- 20Citations
- 10Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In this paper, a hybrid damage detection technique involving a combination of variational mode decomposition (VMD) and frequency domain decomposition (FDD) has been applied to study the effectiveness of damage detection in presence of heavily noise contaminated environment. Damage of small magnitude has been tested under Gaussian pulse noise ranging from 0 to 100% for damage analysis. FDD, a signal processing algorithm, has system identification capability in the presence of noise but requires the output acceleration data from all the sensors installed in the nodes of a structure to identify damage. To reduce the number of sensor data needed to identify damage, wavelet-based algorithms have been used to obtain intrinsic mode functions (IMFs) from single sensor output. These IMFs are then fed to FDD algorithm to obtain the natural frequencies of the structure. For comparison purpose, the algorithms (empirical mode decomposition (EMD) + FDD, and VMD + FDD) have been applied to ASCE benchmark building, which has been set as a common platform, using sensor data of first storey. It was observed that the VMD + FDD gives satisfactory damage identification results for 100% noise contamination whereas EMD + FDD was unable to identify damage accurately for noise above 20%. The robustness of VMD + FDD has been established for a different type of noise, random-valued impulse noise, applied on the benchmark structure for detecting the structural parameters. The hybrid algorithm was also checked for system identification using the sensor data of fourth storey to establish its robustness against the sensitivity of the sensor location.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85087338303&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13349-020-00412-5; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13349-020-00412-5; https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13349-020-00412-5.pdf; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13349-020-00412-5/fulltext.html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13349-020-00412-5; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13349-020-00412-5
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know