Rapid Detection of Caffeine in Coffee Bean Extract Using Ultra-High Performance Liquid Chromatography Coupled to an ID-X-Orbitrap Mass Spectrometer
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, ISSN: 2191-4281, Vol: 47, Issue: 6, Page: 6787-6793
2022
- 2Citations
- 4Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Coffee is the most popular beverage after water and is consumed worldwide. Its consumption in high amount may pose health risks. Moreover, most of the market's available coffee beans products do not mention their proper amount of caffeine. To develop an efficient and reliable method of caffeine extraction in commercial coffee brands, automated solvent extraction was used along with a sensitive, rapid and precise method for simultaneous analysis of caffeine using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography coupled with an ID-X-Orbitrap Mass spectrometer (UHPLC-IDX-Orbitrap-MS). The results showed comparable values to previously published studies. The lowest average amount of caffeine (µg/g) was in the Colombian brand (6.7) and Brazil-CF brand (7.1). The highest average amount of caffeine (µg/g) was in Brazil-C brand (10) and Kenyan brand (10.4). For the rest of coffee beans extract, the caffeine amount was similar varying between 7.7 and 9.7 µg/g. The results demonstrated that the proposed procedure is highly reproducible (with an RSD error of less than 20% for most of the analytes) and the recovery levels of the target compound (i.e., caffeine) varied in the range of 45–88%. Moreover, the limit of detection of caffeine was equal to 1 ng mL. This was a pilot study to examine caffeine extraction from different coffee sources and a future study will identify all active compounds.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know