Utilization of fruit and vegetable wastes as an alternative renewable energy source in ruminants’ diet
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, ISSN: 2190-6823, Vol: 13, Issue: 9, Page: 7909-7917
2023
- 2Citations
- 20Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Most Recent News
Investigators from University of Tabriz Report New Data on Renewable Energy (Utilization of Fruit and Vegetable Wastes As an Alternative Renewable Energy Source In Ruminants' Diet)
2024 FEB 09 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Middle East Daily -- Data detailed on Energy - Renewable Energy have been
Article Description
The utilization of food processing discards would not only contribute towards waste reduction and feed security but also would reduce costs associated with the feedstuff import. These byproducts have been repetitively shown to stimulate animals’ performance while being beneficial to the overall health of animals. The purpose of present study was to determine the nutritional value of apple, carrot, and pomegranate pomace using three-step methods of digestion and gas production test along with determination of the best digestion model. For this purpose, two ruminally fistulated wethers (48 ± 2 kg) were used. The amount of in vitro gas production of experimental diets’ dry matter (DM) was documented at 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h of incubation. Obtained data from different hours of gas production were used to evaluate the digestion models. Pomegranate pomace produced the least cumulative in vitro gas in all incubation times while carrot pomace produced the most (P < 0.05). Estimated parameters of organic matter digestibility (OMD), metabolizable energy (ME), net energy for lactation (NEl), and short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) were highest for carrot and apple pomace, while pomegranate pomace had the lowest values (P < 0.05). Our results for ruminal and post ruminal DM digestibility showed that carrot pomace and barley grain had higher digestibility compared with other groups. Furthermore, results showed that pomegranate had lower digestibility in all parts of the total tract (P < 0.05). Total tract digestibility of protein was highest (88.6%) and lowest (82.9%) for barley grain and pomegranate pomace, respectively (P < 0.05). The non-lagged exponential (model I), the lagged exponential (model II), the Gompertz (model III), and the generalized Mitscherlich (model IV) models were evaluated for describing the results of in vitro gas production. Correspondingly, the Gompertz model with high R and low MSE was the best digestion model. In conclusion, food processing discards could potentially be utilized as alternative feedstuff in the ruminants’ diet with no adverse effect on animals’ performance. Graphical abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.]
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know