Current insulinization trends in India
International Journal of Diabetes in Developing Countries, ISSN: 1998-3832, Vol: 43, Issue: 3, Page: 363-370
2023
- 1Citations
- 7Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Background: Hyperglycemia-associated micro- and macro-vascular complications remain the leading cause of premature morbidity and mortality among the diabetic population worldwide. Poor glycemic control due to clinical inertia towards insulin treatment is a major cause behind the development of diabetic complications. In this paper, we analyze different strategies of insulin treatment initialization and titration practiced in India. Methods: The response of 367 healthcare professionals (HCPs) across the country was recorded based on a survey on demographics, treatment regimens, and patient behavior. For analysis, the responses from HCPs were segregated into six regions, north, south, east, west, and central, covering the entire country. Results: The survey revealed that 59.1% HCPs preferred using three oral anti-diabetic drugs (OADs) before starting insulin therapy while 12.5% initiated insulin as the last option after trying all available OADs. Besides, 61% HCPs across India considered initiating insulin in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients when the patients (i) failed to achieve glycemic targets with current OADs, or (ii) could not tolerate OADs, or (iii) required a more flexible therapy. In T2DM patients, 52.9% HCPs chose basal only insulin during initiation. In comparison, 63.8% HCPs used basal bolus while initiating insulin in type 1 DM (T1DM) patients. Pan-India, 53.4% HCPs preferred analogue premix while 46.6% HCPs opted for human premix. Next, 98.9% HCPs counselled patients about the risk of hypoglycemia upon initiation of insulin. Conclusion: This survey outlines an urgent need of reducing the clinical inertia against insulin initialization in Indian settings.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know