Satisfaction with Control of Mild to Moderate Atopic Dermatitis with Ruxolitinib Cream: US Physician and Patient Perspectives
Dermatology and Therapy, ISSN: 2190-9172, Vol: 14, Issue: 3, Page: 685-696
2024
- 4Citations
- 1Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations4
- Citation Indexes4
- Captures1
- Readers1
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- News1
Most Recent News
Atopic Dermatitis Treatments Before and After Initiation of Ruxolitinib Cream: 6-Month Follow-Up Analysis of a US Payer Claims Database
Jinan Liu,1 Karishma Desai,2 Chia-Chen Teng,2 Daniel Sturm,1 Grace Stockbower,2 Hiten Patadia,1 Vincent Willey2 1Incyte Corporation, Wilmington, DE, USA; 2Carelon Research, Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA
Article Description
Introduction: The 2021 US approval of ruxolitinib cream for treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD) in patients aged ≥ 12 years was based on the results of two pivotal phase 3 studies. Currently, real-world data to describe effectiveness of ruxolitinib cream and physician satisfaction with treatment remain limited. Our objective is to describe disease control among adults with mild to moderate AD prescribed ruxolitinib cream and physician satisfaction with treatment. Methods: Data were from the Adelphi AD Disease Specific Programme™, a US real-world, cross-sectional survey of physician-reported data, undertaken between August 2022 and March 2023. For patients aged ≥ 18 years, physicians reported patient demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and physician satisfaction with disease control. Descriptive analysis of data for patients with mild to moderate AD prior to the initiation of ruxolitinib cream and treated with ruxolitinib cream for ≥ 1 month was undertaken. Results: Among physician-reported data from 1360 patients with AD, 149 patients had received ruxolitinib cream (in combination or as monotherapy) for ≥ 1 month, including 59 patients receiving monotherapy. Prior to treatment with ruxolitinib cream, 84.6% of patients had moderate AD (Investigator’s Global Assessment, IGA of 3), whereas after treatment (median duration, 26 weeks), only 21.5% had an IGA of 3, with 48.3% of patients having clear or almost clear skin (IGA of 0/1). For these patients, 81.2% were not currently experiencing a flare, and physicians were satisfied with disease control for 87.3%. Results were similar in patients receiving monotherapy. The most frequent physician-reported reasons for prescribing ruxolitinib cream included relieving itch, improving lesion redness/thickness, achieving disease control, and reducing/controlling flares. Conclusions: These real-world findings demonstrate effective disease control and physician satisfaction with ruxolitinib cream for the treatment of AD in adults in a clinical practice setting. Outcomes were similar whether ruxolitinib cream was prescribed as monotherapy or in combination regimens, suggesting a role for ruxolitinib cream across the spectrum of disease.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85186874747&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13555-024-01116-0; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38453811; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13555-024-01116-0; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13555-024-01116-0; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13555-024-01116-0
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know