Towards modeling growth of apricot fruit: finding a proper growth model
Horticulture Environment and Biotechnology, ISSN: 2211-3460, Vol: 64, Issue: 2, Page: 209-222
2023
- 7Citations
- 14Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Fruit growth patterns are often exploited in predictions of final fruit size and to inform planting and harvesting decisions. Ten local apricot (Prunus armeniaca) varieties with superior genotypes (two early-ripening, five mid-ripening and three late-ripening varieties) were assessed using 20 nonlinear regression models (NRMs) and a radial basis function (RBF) neural network model. Fruit diameter and weight measurements for each genotype were collected at four-day intervals from fruit set to commercial harvest. Patterns based on diameter and weights were attributed to each genotype. Among the NRM tested, only four were able to flawlessly predict apricot diameter and weight during the growing season. In addition, comparison of nonlinear regression methods with the neural network indicated than the RBF model displayed fewer prediction errors than the NRMs. The RBF model predicted fruit size with a coefficient of determination (R value) greater than 0.95. Therefore, predictions of growth patterns in fruit trees can be accomplished with neural network modeling.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know