Dynamic feature weighting for multi-label classification problems
Progress in Artificial Intelligence, ISSN: 2192-6360, Vol: 10, Issue: 3, Page: 283-295
2021
- 1Citations
- 4Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
This paper proposes a dynamic feature weighting approach for multi-label classification problems. The choice of dynamic weights plays a vital role in such problems because the assigned weight to each feature might be dependent on the query. To take this dependency into account, we optimize our previously proposed dynamic weighting function through a non-convex formulation, resulting in several interesting properties. Moreover, by minimizing the proposed objective function, the samples with similar label sets get closer to each other while getting far away from the dissimilar ones. In order to learn the parameters of the weighting functions, we propose an iterative gradient descent algorithm that minimizes the traditional leave-one-out error rate. We further embed the learned weighting function into one of the popular multi-label classifiers, namely ML-kNN, and evaluate its performance over a set of benchmark datasets. Moreover, a distributed implementation of the proposed method on Spark is suggested to address the computational complexity on large-scale datasets. Finally, we compare the obtained results with several related state-of-the-art methods. The experimental results illustrate that the proposed method consistently achieves superior performances compared to others.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know