Correlation Between the 6-Min Walk Test and Exercise Tolerance Test in Cardiac Rehabilitation After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Cross-sectional Study
Cardiology and Therapy, ISSN: 2193-6544, Vol: 10, Issue: 1, Page: 201-209
2021
- 14Citations
- 43Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations14
- Citation Indexes14
- 14
- Captures43
- Readers43
- 43
Article Description
Introduction: Exercise capacity and quality of life are the main outcomes in cardiac rehabilitation (CR). Exercise capacity is one of the important prognostic and diagnostic measures acquired by the exercise tolerance test (ETT). The 6-min walk test (6MWT), as a functional walking test, is another tool for assessing exercise capacity. Methods: Eighty postoperative coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) participants admitted to three CR units were recruited for this cross-sectional and multicenter study, based on convenient non-probability sampling. All participants performed an ETT and two repeated 6MWTs. Maximum heart rate (HR), maximum blood pressure (BP), maximal oxygen uptake (VO2), and peak metabolic equivalents of tasks (MET) during the tests and also the 6-min walk distance (6MWD) were the outcome measures. Results: The mean age of all participants was 62.13 (7.12) years and 80% were male. Pearson correlation showed that maximum HR (r(78) = 0.67, P < 0.001) and maximum systolic BP (r(78) = 0.57, P < 0.001) during the 6MWT correlated moderately with those achieved during ETT. Maximum HR in the 6MWT corresponded to 86% of that achieved during ETT. The 6MWD showed a strong positive correlation with peak MET estimated during ETT as a measure of exercise capacity (r = 0.77, P < 0.001). Conclusions: The results from this study suggest that the 6MWT is a valid tool for assessing functional capacity for prescribing exercise in a group of postoperative CABG participants admitted to CR units. This finding is helpful for healthcare professionals and for patients, as the test is easy to administer and also well tolerated by patients. Trial Registration Number: PHT-9923.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85118089830&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40119-021-00210-0; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33586086; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40119-021-00210-0; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40119-021-00210-0; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40119-021-00210-0
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know